2025 Sample Ballot
Vote Now - Use a Drop Box
The Gold Grift | Dale Whitaker
Book Review by Rob Linebarger
The Gold Grift: Secrets of the American Gold IRA Scam by Dale Whitaker is a must-read for anyone nearing retirement and weighing the idea of converting their IRA or 401(k) into gold.
With a compelling mix of memoir and investigative reporting, Dale exposes how fear-based marketing and patriotic appeals are used to lure responsible savers into overpriced gold IRAs—often with devastating financial consequences.
Dale’s journey begins as a bookkeeper who rises to CFO of a booming precious metals firm. At first, he believes he’s helping Americans protect their retirement. But soon, aided by a debate with his assistant, uncovers a disturbing truth: the company’s profits depend on selling “exclusive” coins at markups of 80–200%, often through misleading tactics. These coins—pitched as rare and secure—are frequently worth little more than their melt value and in 99% of cases, worth less than equivalent retail bullion products initially and over time.
For investors with substantial equity in retirement accounts, this book is a wake-up call. Dale explains how gold companies target people like you—those who’ve worked hard, saved diligently, and want to shield their assets from inflation or market volatility. Ads feature trusted conservative voices and patriotic imagery, urging listeners to convert their IRAs into gold-backed accounts. But behind the glossy brochures lies a ruthless scheme: sales reps use fear of economic collapse, government overreach, and market instability to pressure clients into liquidating traditional retirement accounts and buying overpriced coins.
Dale’s insider view is chilling. He describes how sales teams are trained to manipulate emotions, invoking religious prophecy, political identity, and financial anxiety to close deals. The victims aren’t reckless speculators—they’re responsible savers trying to protect their future. Many end up with illiquid assets they can’t easily sell, and retirement accounts that have been gutted.
As Dale’s conscience awakens, he becomes a whistleblower. He works with regulators, submits testimony to Congress, and helps recover tens of thousands and with the release of this book, possibly millions, in stolen retirement funds. His battles with media outlets and political influencers—some of whom once endorsed the scams—add urgency and drama to the narrative. The book doesn’t just expose wrongdoing; it shows the moral cost of silence and the courage required to speak out.
In the second half, The Gold Grift becomes a practical guide. Dale outlines four major red flags that signal a predatory gold company: inflated pricing, fear-driven marketing, fake scarcity claims, and pressure to convert IRAs. He also provides resources for victims to seek restitution, making the book not only informative but potentially life changing.
For anyone considering gold as a hedge against uncertainty, Dale’s message is clear: be vigilant. His writing is direct, emotional, and grounded in facts, balancing financial analysis with human stories of loss and resilience. He urges readers to think critically about who they trust with their financial future.
In sum, The Gold Grift is essential reading for pre-retirees with equity in an IRA or 401(k). Dale’s journey from insider to whistleblower offers clarity, courage, and a roadmap for ethical investing—empowering readers to ask hard questions, demand transparency, and protect their retirement with wisdom and confidence.
The Gold Grift by Dale Whitaker presently has a 5-Star rating on Amazon
Caleb Collier, host of the Church and State Podcast
ChurchandState1776 Podcast on Rumble
Thomas Jefferson's Wall
History & True Intent of Separation of Church and State
Thomas Jefferson’s 1802 metaphor of a “wall of separation between church and state,” written to the Danbury Baptist Association, remains central to debates over religious liberty.
Often misinterpreted, Jefferson’s intent was not to secularize public life but to shield religious practice from government control.
The Danbury Baptists feared their freedoms were state-granted privileges, not inherent rights. Jefferson reassured them that the First Amendment built a barrier to prevent federal interference in religious affairs. His metaphor affirmed that government would neither establish a national religion nor obstruct free religious expression.
Jefferson’s views stemmed from his Virginia Statute for Religious Freedom (1786), which disestablished the Church of England and guaranteed that no citizen would be forced to support religious worship. He saw religious liberty as a natural right essential to human dignity and republican governance. The state, in his view, should remain neutral—not hostile—toward religion, allowing diverse beliefs to flourish without coercion or favoritism.
Importantly, Jefferson did not seek to exclude religious values from civic life. He attended services in government buildings and supported religious charities. His concern was institutional entanglement, not personal expression. The “wall” was a safeguard against tyranny, not a barrier to moral discourse.
Recent legislation in Oklahoma, Louisiana, Texas, and Arkansas—mandating Bibles or Ten Commandments in classrooms—has reignited debate over Jefferson’s metaphor. Oklahoma’s 2024 Bible mandate, later rescinded in 2025, and Ten Commandments laws in three states have faced legal challenges for allegedly violating the Establishment Clause.
Supporters argue these symbols reflect America’s religious heritage; opponents claim they breach constitutional protections. These efforts reflect a broader conservative strategy to challenge precedents like Stone v. Graham (1980) and test the limits of Jefferson’s “wall” in a more religion-friendly judicial climate.
Ultimately, Jefferson’s wall was built to protect religious liberty—not suppress religious identity. Its meaning continues to evolve, shaped by shifting political winds and judicial interpretations.
